| |
guavac hates me |
| |
midnightTrooper (02:02 13/12/2003)
ninj (18:33 15/12/2003)
mavhc (01:21 16/12/2003)
monkeyson2 (01:33 16/12/2003)
Phlamethrower (01:35 16/12/2003)
pnaulls (20:06 16/12/2003)
john (23:31 16/12/2003)
ninj (17:44 17/12/2003)
john (19:11 17/12/2003)
midnightTrooper (03:46 12/1/2004)
|
| |
|
Lewis Westbury |
Message #48755, posted by midnightTrooper at 02:02, 13/12/2003 |
Member
Posts: 147
|
why do I get:
*guavac NetworkObject.java
>> Warning: Invalid classpath entry /ADFS::HardDisc4/$/Java/!guavac/classes.zip
Could not find java/lang/Object in the class path.
Compilation Failed
??? |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
ninjah |
Message #48793, posted by ninj at 18:33, 15/12/2003, in reply to message #48755 |
Member
Posts: 288
|
You've got an invalid classpath. It can't even find the base Object if it's entire classpath is duff.
As for what's wrong with your classpath though, it's to do with the RISC OS -> Unix mangling that goes on I'd guess, and when it comes to specifying file systems and disc names in this sort of mangled syntax it's all a bit of a black art to me, I'm afraid. I assume you have installed !guavac to ADFS::4.$.Java, and it contains a file called classes.zip? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Mark Scholes |
Message #48797, posted by mavhc at 01:21, 16/12/2003, in reply to message #48793 |
Member
Posts: 660
|
You've got an invalid classpath. It can't even find the base Object if it's entire classpath is duff.
As for what's wrong with your classpath though, it's to do with the RISC OS -> Unix mangling that goes on I'd guess, and when it comes to specifying file systems and disc names in this sort of mangled syntax it's all a bit of a black art to me, I'm afraid. I assume you have installed !guavac to ADFS::4.$.Java, and it contains a file called classes.zip? And the file isn't filetyped something that sparkfs will pick up and make into an image file. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #48800, posted by monkeyson2 at 01:33, 16/12/2003, in reply to message #48797 |
 Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Maybe SparkFS is causing the problem. Maybe guavac wants to treat classes/zip as a file, but the RISC OS file system is treating it as an image file / directory. I remember having problems like this when trying to load an archive into SparkPlug (ie. treating as a file) when ArcFS was loaded (so it was treated as an image directory). |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #48801, posted by Phlamethrower at 01:35, 16/12/2003, in reply to message #48800 |
 Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Maybe SparkFS is causing the problem. Maybe guavac wants to treat classes/zip as a file, but the RISC OS file system is treating it as an image file / directory. I remember having problems like this when trying to load an archive into SparkPlug (ie. treating as a file) when ArcFS was loaded (so it was treated as an image directory). I.e., what mav said  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Peter Naulls |
Message #48828, posted by pnaulls at 20:06, 16/12/2003, in reply to message #48755 |
Member
Posts: 317
|
why do I get:
*guavac NetworkObject.java
>> Warning: Invalid classpath entry /ADFS::HardDisc4/$/Java/!guavac/classes.zip
Could not find java/lang/Object in the class path.
Compilation Failed
??? The only ??? is why you didn't contact the maintainer of the RISC OS port (???). |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John D |
Message #48854, posted by john at 23:31, 16/12/2003, in reply to message #48828 |
Member
Posts: 261
|
Serious query; if someone has any problem with something under the Unix Porting Project, I got the idea (http://www.chocky.org/unix/ section "Support") that you wouldn't help unless they were a member. From the above response it would seem that perhaps I (and maybe they) misunderstood. If you have a moment, it'd be nice if you could clarify for the benefit of myself, and perhaps anyone else who may have misunderstood, what you'd expect to be contacted about, and what one has to join for.
Edit: assuming of course that I'm correct in saying they you are the maintainer of the RO port, you appear to be from what I could tell!
[Edited by john at 23:32, 16/12/2003] |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
ninjah |
Message #48893, posted by ninj at 17:44, 17/12/2003, in reply to message #48854 |
Member
Posts: 288
|
Just because support isn't given, it's still reasonable to expect bug reports from users. That's clear. I'd also have thought it polite to distinguish between an actual bug and your own stupidity before bothering the (unpaid) maintainer, which is think is what this thread was about. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
John D |
Message #48895, posted by john at 19:11, 17/12/2003, in reply to message #48893 |
Member
Posts: 261
|
That sounds sensible, but I thought Chocky was implying that he should have contacted the maintainer of the RISC OS port before making the post. It was that which led to my confusion and whether to contact for things which may well be bugs or equally configuration errors. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Lewis Westbury |
Message #49536, posted by midnightTrooper at 03:46, 12/1/2004, in reply to message #48828 |
Member
Posts: 147
|
The only ??? is why you didn't contact the maintainer of the RISC OS port (???). I apologise. I had supposed that my problem was going to have an obvious "you're doing something wrong you dumbass" answer and that you wouldn't be interested. I consider iconbar a safe place to whack my question up and find out if I am in fact way off track. Saves you the trouble of having to deal with me if it was me screwed up.
In future, I'm happy to direct questions to you. It wasn't a snub.
Lewis |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
